IJSHMS

Educational Assessment Administration in Low Resourced Rural Secondary Schools in Zimbabwe: Challenges, Coping Strategies and Educational Outcomes in Beitbridge District, Matabeleland South Province, Zimbabwe

© 2026 by IJSHMS

Volume 4 Issue 4

Year of Publication : 2026

Author : Norbert Hosho, Arnold Maviya, Gerald Munyoro

Citation :

Norbert Hosho, Arnold Maviya, Gerald Munyoro, 2026. "Educational Assessment Administration in Low Resourced Rural Secondary Schools in Zimbabwe: Challenges, Coping Strategies and Educational Outcomes in Beitbridge District, Matabeleland South Province, Zimbabwe" ESP International Journal of Science, Humanities & Management Studies(ESP-IJSHMS)  Volume 4, Issue 4: 135-145.

Abstract :

Educational assessment administration is essential for monitoring learner progress, informing instructional decisions and promoting equitable educational outcomes. However, resource constraints may undermine assessment quality, particularly in rural secondary schools where material shortages, workload pressures and limited professional support intersect. This qualitative study employed an interpretivist single-case study design to examine assessment administration in a resource-constrained rural secondary school in Beitbridge District, Matabeleland South Province, Zimbabwe. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, learner focus group discussions, non-participant observations and documentary analysis. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret the data. Findings revealed that shortages of assessment materials, competing teacher responsibilities and limited time constrained assessment preparation, marking and feedback. Teachers employed collaborative planning, shared assessment instruments, locally available materials and peer moderation to sustain assessment activities. However, coping strategies varied in their capacity to preserve assessment validity, consistency and fairness. Household poverty and unequal access to learning resources further affected assessment participation and preparation. Assessment contributed to educational improvement when teachers used performance evidence to identify learning difficulties, provide feedback and organise remedial instruction. The findings position assessment administration as both a pedagogical practice and an institutional equity responsibility. Sustainable improvement requires needs-based funding, strengthened teacher assessment literacy, manageable workloads and systematic support for inclusive, evidence-informed assessment, advancing Sustainable Development Goal 4.

References :

[1] AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

[2] Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.

[3] Black, P., & Wiiam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31

[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

[5] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

[6] Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12.

[7] Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547.

[8] Chanda, P. (2022). Teachers’ level of use of continuous assessment practice in Kwekwe District secondary schools, Zimbabwe. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education.

[9] Collins, C., Neely, M. T., & Khan, S. (2024). “Which cases do I need?” Constructing cases and observations in qualitative research. Annual Review of Sociology, 50, 21–40.

[10] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[11] Dhliwayo, A., & Jita, T. (2023). An analysis of the relevance of the continuous assessment of learning activities (CALA) in ICT resource-constrained educational environments: A case of Zimbabwe secondary school education. Artha Journal of Social Sciences, 22(2), 41–61.

[12] Government of Zimbabwe. (1987). Education Act [Chapter 25:04] (Act 5 of 1987), as amended.

[13] Government of Zimbabwe. (2020). Education Amendment Act, 2019 (Act 15 of 2019).

[14] Hao, J., von Davier, A. A., Yaneva, V., Lottridge, S., von Davier, M., & Harris, D. (2024). Transforming assessment: The impacts and implications of large language models and generative AI. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 43(2), 16–29.

[15] Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

[16] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

[17] Makuvire, C., Mufanechiya, A., & Dube, B. (2023). Unpacking continuous assessment: Teacher knowledge and attitudes in Zimbabwe rural secondary schools. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 5(2), 207–225.

[18] Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.

[19] Masiiwa, S. T., & Last, M. (2024). A review of Continuous Assessment Learning Activity (CALA) in Zimbabwe: 2017–2023. International Journal of Integrative Studies.

[20] Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2015). Curriculum framework for primary and secondary education 2015–2022. Government of Zimbabwe.

[21] MoPSE (2021). Education sector strategic plan 2021–2025. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. Government of Zimbabwe.

[22] Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), Article e3292.

[23] OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing.

[24] OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing.

[25] OECD. (2025). Unlocking high-quality teaching. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing.

[26] Preparing assessment literate teachers: A cross-national trend analysis. (2025). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, Article 101485.

[27] Risiro, J. (2022). Bridging the gap between classroom practice and world of work: A case of competency based continuous assessment learning activities in Geography, Mutare Urban Cluster, Zimbabwe. The Journal of Geography Education in Africa, 4(1), 75–101.

[28] Sithole, S., Dziwa, D. D., & Matsvange, M. (2022). Teachers’ perception on the challenges of continuous assessment implementation between 2017 and 2018 in Zimbabwean primary and secondary schools. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences.

[29] Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.

[30] UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all.

[31] UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms?

[32] UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Leadership in education—Lead for learning.

[33] UNICEF Zimbabwe. (2026). UNICEF education budget brief 2026.

[34] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1).

[35] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Monitoring SDG 4.

[36] Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101425.

[37] Wiles, R. (2013). What are qualitative research ethics? Bloomsbury Academic.

[38] Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 40.

[39] Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162.

[40] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[41] Zhan, Y., Boud, D., & Du, Z. (2026). Designing for authentic assessment: A scoping review. Higher Education, 92, 1591–1608.

Keywords :

Educational Assessment Administration, Rural Secondary Schools, Resource Constraints, Assessment Literacy, Coping Strategies, Formative Assessment, Educational Outcomes, SDG 4.