Citation :

Faraz Ahmed, 2023. "Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM): Automating Security Policy Enforcement in Cloud Environments", ESP International Journal of Advancements in Computational Technology (ESP-IJACT)  Volume 1, Issue 3: 157-166.

Abstract :

Cloud computing has transformed IT by offering scalability, cost efficiency, and flexibility, yet it has also introduced complex security risks, including misconfigurations, identity mismanagement, and compliance violations. Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) has emerged as a critical solution to address these challenges by automating the continuous assessment and remediation of cloud environments. This paper explores the architecture, working mechanisms, and benefits of CSPM, focusing on its role in enforcing security policies through automation. It highlights common cloud security threats, the importance of proactive posture management, and the integration of CSPM with DevSecOps and emerging technologies like AI. Additionally, it discusses leading CSPM tools, their features, and future trends in the domain. By analyzing current practices and research, the paper concludes with strategic recommendations for organizations seeking to enhance cloud security through CSPM.

References :

[1] Mell, Peter, and Tim Grance. "The NIST definition of cloud computing." (2011).
[2] M. Saraswat and R. C. Tripathi, “Cloud computing: Comparison and analysis of cloud service providers—AWS, Microsoft and Google,” in Proc. 2020 9th Int. Conf. System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), 2020.
[3] Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., ... & Zaharia, M. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50-58.
[4] Kumar, R., & Goyal, R. (2021). Top threats to cloud: a three-dimensional model of cloud security assurance. In Computer Networks and Inventive Communication Technologies: Proceedings of Third ICCNCT 2020 (pp. 683-705). Springer Singapore.
[5] S. Bhartiya, “Sysdig Report Reveals 73% of Cloud Accounts Contain Exposed S3 Buckets,” TFiR, Jan. 26, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://tfir.io/sysdig-report-reveals-73-of-cloud-accounts-contain-exposed-s3-buckets/.
[6] Wijaya, G., & Avian, A. (2022, April). Analysis of cloud computing infrastructure system with nist standard cloud computing standards roadmap. In CoMBInES-Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 471-478).
[7] Z. Li et al., “An empirical study of cloud API issues,” IEEE Cloud Comput., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 58–72, 2018.
[8] SUNDARAM, J., & CISA, I. Analyzing and Adapting Cybersecurity Lessons: Safeguarding Organizations Through Strategic Alignment and Continuous Improvement.
[9] V. J. R. Winkler, Securing the Cloud: Cloud Computer Security Techniques and Tactics. Elsevier, 2011.
[10] M. Lane, A. Shrestha, and O. Ali, “Managing the risks of data security and privacy in the cloud: A shared responsibility between the cloud service provider and the client organisation,” in Proc. Bright Internet Global Summit 2017, 2017.
[11] P. Paganini, “Accenture – Embarrassing data leak business data in a public Amazon S3 bucket,” Security Affairs, Oct. 11, 2017.
[12] Roncone, G., Wahlstrom, A., Revelli, A., Mainor, D., Riddell, S., & Read, B. (2021). UNC1151 Assessed with High Confidence to have Links to Belarus, Ghostwriter Campaign Aligned with Belarusian Government Interests| Mandiant. Hg. v. MANDIANT. Online verfügbar unter https://www. mandiant. com/resources/unc115.
[13] L. Kessem, “The 2022 Cost of a Data Breach Report is now published!” IBM Community, Jul. 27, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://community.ibm.com/community/user/security/blogs/limor-kessem1/2022/07/27/the-2022-cost-of-a-data-breach-report-is-now-publi
[14] Xia, T., Washizaki, H., Fukazawa, Y., Kaiya, H., Ogata, S., Fernandez, E. B., ... & Hazeyama, A. (2021). CSPM: Metamodel for handling security and privacy knowledge in cloud service development. International Journal of Systems and Software Security and Protection (IJSSSP), 12(2), 68-85.
[15] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2022). Platform firmware resiliency guidelines (NIST Special Publication 800-193). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-193
[16] IBM Security, Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022. IBM Corporation, 2022.[Online].Available: https://www.key4biz.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Cost-of-a-Data-Breach-Full-Report-2022.pdf
[17] Lukkarinen, Pasi. "Data Center Automation-and Hybrid Cloud System Requirements." (2020).
[18] Business Wire, “TAG Cyber Study of Security Automation Reveals 240% ROI for Organizations,” Business Wire, Oct. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221025005045/en/TAG-Cyber-Study-of-Security-Automation-Reveals-240-ROI-for-Organizations
[19] Dixit, S. (2022). AI-powered risk modeling in quantum finance: Redefining enterprise decision systems. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(4), 547–572. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET221656
[20] S. Chinamanagonda, “Security in Multi-cloud Environments—Heightened focus on securing multi-cloud deployments,” J. Innov. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–28, 2019.
[21] RadarFirst, “Data Breach Resolution 22% Faster in 2021 for Organizations Embracing Intelligent Automation,” PR Newswire, Apr. 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/data-breach-resolution-22-faster-in-2021-for-organizations-embracing-intelligent-automation-301527570.html.
[22] Dixit, S. (2020). The impact of quantum supremacy on cryptography: Implications for secure financial transactions. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(4), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2064141

Keywords :

Cloud Computing, CSPM, Cloud Security