Citation :

Perumala Susmitha, S. Narayana Reddy, 2023. "Evaluating the advantages of Image based Shoreline Change Detection Analysis over Traditional GIS based Shoreline Change Detection Method (DSAS)" ESP International Journal of Communication Engineering & Electronics Technology (ESP- IJCEET)  Volume 1, Issue 1 : 32-42

.

Abstract :

The current study is an evaluation and comparison of the conventional GIS based shoreline change analysis and using the change detection techniques using image-processing method. The study area chosen is 253 km long coast along the districts of Kakinada, and Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. The coast is very dynamic environment, with the Godavari River in the southern-most part delivering many sediments, and many tropical cyclones affecting the area almost every year. The shoreline change performed through Digital Shoreline Change Analysis (DSAS) in the more common and conventional way and serves as the baseline for comparing the image-based shoreline change, from the change detection method. The study shows that the Image based method is reliable for a region where the coast does not have much of wave action to measure the change detection precisely and faster. However, for a more accurate measurement, and for regions where manual intervention and interpretation were required, the conventional GIS based analysis is more suitable.

References :

[1] Adarsa Jana, SabyasachiMaiti&Arkoprovo Biswas. Analysis of short-term shoreline oscillations along Midnapur-Balasore Coast, Bay of Bengal, India: a study based on geospatial technology. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2016, 
[2] Albuquerque, Miguel, et al. "Erosion or coastal variability: An evaluation of the DSAS and the change polygon methods for the determination of erosive processes on sandy beaches." Journal of Coastal Research 65 (10065) (2013): 1710-1714. 
[3] Andrews B., P Gares and J. Colby. 2002. Techniques for GIS modeling of coastal dunes. Journal of Geomorphology 48: 289-308. 
[4] Ashbindu Singh. Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data., International Journal of Remote Sensing., 1989, 10, 989-1003. 
[5] Baily B, Nowell D., Techniques for monitoring coastal change. Ocean and Coastal Management 2., 1996, 32, 85-95. 
[6] Bush, D., R. Webb, L. Hyman, J. Liboy, and J. Neal. 1995. Living with the Puerto Rico Shore, 214 Geomorphology of Puerto Rico, Duke University Press, Durham, NC. 
[7] Bush, M. David, O. Pilkey Jr., and W. Neal. 1996. Living by the Rules of the Sea. 179. Living with the Shore, Duke University Press, Durham, NC. 
[8] Cendrero A. Mapping and evaluation of coastal areas for planning., Ocean and Shoreline Management, 1989, 12, 427–462. 
[9] Darius Phiri and Justin Morgenroth. Developments in Landsat Land Cover Classification Methods: A Review., Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 967. 
[10] Dolan R., B. Hayden and J. Heywood. 1978. A new photogrammetric method for determining shoreline erosion. Coastal Engineering, 2: 21-39. 
[11] Dolan R., M. Fenster and S. Holme. 1991. Temporal analysis of shoreline recession and accretion. Journal of Coastal research 7(3): 723-744. 
[12] Dong P. and H. Chen. 1999. A probability method for predicting time dependent long-term shoreline erosion. Coastal Engineering 36: 243-261. 
[13] Douglas B., M. Crowell and S. Leatherman. 1998. Considerations for shoreline position prediction. Journal of Coastal Research 14(3): 1025-1033. Douglas B. and M. Crowell. 2000. Long-term shoreline position prediction and error propagation. Journal of Coastal Research 16(1): 145-152. Duffy W. and S. Dickson 1995. Using grid and graph to quantify and display shoreline change. White paper, Maine Office of Geographic Information Systems, Augusta, Maine.
[14] Fanos A., A. Khafagy, and R. Dean. 1995. Protective works on the Nile delta coast. Journal of Coastal Research 11: 516-528 FEMA. 2000. Evaluation of Erosion Hazards, Summary. Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/hazards/hnz_erosn.pdf accessed July 8, 2003 
[15] Fenster M., R. Dolan and J. Elder. 1993. A new method for predicting shoreline positions from historical data. Journal of Coastal Research 9(1): 147-171 
[16] Frihy O. and M. Lotfy. 1994. Mineralogy and textures of beach sands in relation to erosion and accretion along the Rosetta promontory of the Nile delta, Egypt. Journal of Coastal Research 10: 588-599. 
[17] Fountoulis, Ioannis, et al. "Synergy of tectonic geomorphology, applied geophysics and remote sensing techniques reveals new data for active extensional tectonism in NW Peloponnese (Greece)." Geomorphology 237 (2015): 52-64. 
[18] Harman J., 2002. Study suggests many factors affect erosion on beaches with seawalls. Civil Engineering Vol. 72, Issue 
[19] Hayes, M. O., 1979. Barrier island morphology as a function of tidal and wave regime. In: S. P. Leatherman (Ed), Barrier Islands from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mexico. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–28. 
[20] Helene Burningham, Miriam Fernandez-Nunez. Sandy Beach Morphodynamics., 2020, 439-460. 
[21] Kannan R, Ramanamurthy MV and Kanungo A. Shoreline Change Monitoring in Nellore Coast at East Coast Andhra Pradesh District Using Remote Sensing and GIS., J Fisheries Livest Prod 4, 2016, 161. 
[22] Mani Murali R, Shrivastava D, Vethamony P., Monitoring shoreline environment of Paradip, east coast of india using remote sensing. Current Science., 2009, 97, 79-84. 23. Mei Xiang, Chih-Cheng Hung ,MinhDinh Pham ,Bor-Chen Kuo and T.Coleman. A parallelepiped multispectral image classifier using genetic algorithms., Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005, 1. 
[23] Morelock, J., 1978, Standards for Measuring Shoreline Changes; A Study of the Precision Obtainable, and Needed, in Making Measurements of Changes (erosion and accretion). Coastal Research and the Geology Dept., Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, p. 63-64. 
[24] Prasad D.H and N.D. Kumar., Coastal erosion studies – a review. International Journal of Geosciences.,2014, 5, 341-345. 
[25] Parthasarathy K.S.S., SaravananSubbarayan, Abijith D. Shoreline Change Detection Using Geo-Spatial Techniques- A case Study for Cuddalore Coast., 6th International symposium on Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering Practices for Sustainable Development, 2018. 
[26] Saranya G, Azhagu Kowshik A M, Cibiraj M, Hariharan P, Harish Ramana Kumar G, 2022. "A Deep Learning Model For Brain Tumor Segmentation & Classification Using U-Net & Inception-Net"ESP Journal of Engineering & Technology Advancements  2(4): 20-23.
[27] P Sherman D. and P. Gares. 2000. The geomorphology of coastal environments. Geomorphology 48: 1-6. 
[28] Rashmi S, SwapnaAddamani , Venkat and Ravikiran S. Spectral Angle Mapper Algorithm for Remote Sensing Image Classification., International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2014. 
[29] Shalowitz A. 1964. Shore and Sea Boundaries: U.S. Department of Commerce Publication. Washington DC, 10-1, v.2, 729. 
[30] Xiaofang Liu and Chun Yang.a Kernel Spectral Angle Mapper Algorithm for Remote Sensing Image Classification., 6th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP 2013), 2013, pp. 814-818.

Keywords :

Change Detection, DSAS, Image Processing, Godavari Coast, Shoreline Change.