IJCSIT

Identifying and Measuring Developments in Artificial Intelligence: Making the Impossible Possible

© 2025 by IJCSIT

Volume 1 Issue 1

Year of Publication : 2025

Author : Dr. Rashed Mustafa

: XXXXXXXX

Citation :

Dr. Rashed Mustafa, 2025. "Identifying and Measuring Developments in Artificial Intelligence: Making the Impossible Possible" International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology  Volume 1, Issue 1: 9-15.

Abstract :

Respected as one of the most revolutionary technologies of the twenty-first century, artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming sectors, addressing difficult challenges, and allowing long thought unachievable advances. From machine learning and deep learning to natural language processing and autonomous systems, artificial intelligence has advanced remarkably in fields including robotics, healthcare, finance, and transportation. These developments have improved human capacities as well as changed the limits of possibility in scientific research, medical diagnoses, and even artistic endeavours. Unprecedented degrees of accuracy and efficiency have been made possible by the use of artificial intelligence algorithms in real-time decision making and data analysis of enormous volumes. Examining how major advancements in artificial intelligence help to solve once insurmount problems as predicting disease outcomes, inventing new materials, or investigating space, this study explores the major advancements in AI. It also emphasises how benchmark datasets, performance criteria, and cooperative research—among other approaches—help to gauge AI development. Although artificial intelligence has great promise, it also brings ethical questions, the possibility of biassed decision-making, and worries about job displacement. Through investigating these aspects, the article offers a thorough picture of artificial intelligence's present course and transforming power as well as views on how these breakthroughs are enabling the impossible and so influencing the direction of technology and society.

References :

[1] Amodei, D., et al. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.

[2] Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

[3] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company.

[4] Chollet, F. (2019). On the measure of intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01547.

[5] Cowen, T. (2020). AI and the Great Stagnation. Marginal Revolution Books.

[6] Domingos, P. (2015). The master algorithm: How the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. Basic Books.

[7] Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.

[8] European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (AI Act).

[9] Floridi, L. (2019). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261–262.

[10] Gunning, D. (2017). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). DARPA.

[11] Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14.

[12] Hao, K. (2020). We analyzed 16,625 papers to figure out where AI is headed next. MIT Technology Review.

[13] HLEG on AI. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission.

[14] Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260.

[15] Kaplan, J., et al. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.

[16] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

[17] Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. A. (2012). Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press.

[18] Marcus, G. (2020). The next decade in AI: Four steps towards robust artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06177.

[19] Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Penguin.

[20] Mulgan, G. (2018). AI and Collective Intelligence. Nesta.

[21] OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence.

[22] OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774.

[23] Pearl, J. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.

[24] Rahwan, I., et al. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477–486.

[25] Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

[26] Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117.

[27] Silver, D., et al. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489.

[28] Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02243.

[29] Sutton, R. S. (2019). The bitter lesson. Incomplete Ideas Blog.

[30] Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.

[31] U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). AI Risk Management Framework.

[32] UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.

[33] Vincent, J. (2023). OpenAI launches GPT-4 Turbo. The Verge.

[34] Wang, P., et al. (2021). Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300.

[35] Whittlestone, J., et al. (2019). The role and limits of principles in AI ethics: Towards a focus on tensions. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.

[36] WIPO. (2019). Technology Trends 2019: Artificial Intelligence.

[37] Xu, T., et al. (2023). GPT performance on academic and professional benchmarks. arXiv preprint.

[38] Zeng, J., et al. (2022). Trust and AI: Measuring public perceptions. AI & Society.

[39] Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). A framework for evaluating AI progress. AI Magazine, 42(2), 13–26.

[40] Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.

[41] Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

[42] Bengio, Y. (2021). System 2 deep learning. NeurIPS Keynote.

[43] Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer.

[44] Hinton, G. (2023). Reflections on neural nets and cognition. Lecture at University of Toronto.

[45] Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (Eds.). (2011). Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press.

[46] IEEE. (2019). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems.

[47] Bengio, Y., & LeCun, Y. (2007). Scaling learning algorithms towards AI. In Large-scale kernel machines (pp. 321–360).

[48] AI Index. (2024). Annual AI Index Report. Stanford University.

[49] Benaich, I., & Hogarth, N. (2023). State of AI Report.

[50] Amodei, D., et al. (2021). AI and compute. OpenAI Blog.

Keywords :

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Applications Of Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation Of AI Development, Artificial Intelligence Challenges, Artificial Intelligence Ethics.