IJCESA

E-Governance and Citizen Trust: Assessing the Effectiveness of Digital Public Service Delivery

© 2025 by IJCESA

Volume 2 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2025

Author : Gayathri S, S. Kavitha

Article ID : IJCESA-V2I2P104

Citation :

Gayathri S, S. Kavitha, 2025. "E-Governance and Citizen Trust: Assessing the Effectiveness of Digital Public Service Delivery" International Journal of Community Empowerment & Society Administration [IJCESA]  Volume 2, Issue 2: 28-38.

Abstract :

The nexus between state and citizens has been fundamentally transformed by the rapid digitisation of public authorities around the world. One of the components of modern public sector reforms is e-governance, it can be defined as the systematic application of ICT to improve public service, to increase transparency and to enhance citizen’s participation. Technological tools, mobile apps and integrated systems have been increasingly adopted by governments in order to streamline service delivery, reduce bureaucratic frictions and access citizens across broader geographies. Proponents of e-governance argue that by demonstrating competence, accountability, and fairness these new forms of digital modes not only improve the efficiency with which services are rendered to the people but also enhance governmental credibility. The impact of e-governance on public trust nevertheless is not uniform or linear. Although some research indicates that citizens’ trust is enhanced when services are transparent, accessible, reliable and easy to use, other studies highlight problems such as bad usability, exclusion from digital access and concerns over data privacy that can undermine trust. Indeed, how digital platforms are designed, used, and sustained is crucial and not just their existence – which does not necessarily guarantee legitimacy or trust. Psychological trust in perceived service quality, openness, opportunities for interaction and the protection against data misuse) mediate the system trust relationship Policy (economic disparity among ethnicity groups, political context and internet related knowledge functional as moderators).The value of digital public service delivery in also enhancing public trust is closely examined in this paper. Its novelty is that it integrates empirical findings from the developed and developing countries, as well as world level frameworks like World Bank’s Gov Tech Maturity Index (GTMI) and UN E-Government Development Index (EGDI). The research argues that with the prioritization of inclusivity in e-governance, strengthening of accountability mechanisms, ensuring data security and promoting participatory governance would enhance trust. Conversely, trust can be eroded even in societies with advanced digital infrastructures User-centric designisn't from poor/poorly delivered video calls to war!!inadequate institutional safeguards if the digital gap remains unbridgedACHI 2020!~39resentation: (c) mercado.pptx28 avril 2020 Ce qu'il ne faut pas faire By applying a mixed method research design and a theoretical approach this study contributes to the growing literature of e-governance and trust creation. It argues that government needs to measure success (in user satisfaction, inclusivity and legitimacy) not just by the size of its infrastructure but by outcomes too. Finally, e-governance can be a powerful means to rebuild citizen trust and reinforce democratic processes, but only when conceived in terms of transition that is accountable and people-centered rather than merely technological innovation.

References :

[1] Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2018). E-Government 2.0: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Computer Applications, 180(1), 1-6.

[2] Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-Government Maturity Models: Extension of the Layne and Lee Model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236-248.

[3] Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.

[4] Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press.

[5] Chen, Y., & Li, X. (2023). The Impact of E-Government on Public Trust: A Meta-Analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101-115.

[6] Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development: Conceptual Framework and State of Research. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 94-109.

[7] Haque, M. S., & Rattan, R. (2020). E-Government and Transparency: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(14), 1183-1194.

[8] Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing E-Government: An International Text. SAGE Publications.

[9] Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean Government and Platform-Based Governance – Doing More with Less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 1-12.

[10] Jopang, J., Aryatama, S., Muazzinah, M., Qamal, Q., & Ansar, A. (2024). Exploring the Relationship Between E-Government, Transparency, and Citizen Trust in Government Services. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(6).

[11] Kettunen, P., & Kallio, J. (2017). Digital Government Transformation: A Case Study of the Finnish Government. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 607-615.

[12] Lee-Geiller, S. (2024). The Moderating Effect of Digital Literacy on the Link Between E-Government and Public Trust. Journal of Public Service, 39(4), 77-89.

[13] Li, Y., & Li, X. (2022). Digital Literacy and Online Political Participation: A Study of Chinese Citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101-112.

[14] Mansoor, M., & Haque, M. S. (2021). Citizens' Trust in Government as a Function of Good Governance Practices. Journal of Public Administration, 49(3), 345-358.

[15] Moon, M. J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government Among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.

[16] Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Georgetown University Press.

[17] OECD. (2025). Governments Should Strengthen Public Trust by Improving Efficiency, Citizen Engagement, and Access to Public Services. OECD Press Release.

[18] OECD. (2024). Digital Government. OECD Policy Brief.

[19] OECD. (2020). Embracing Innovation in Government: Global Trends 2020. OECD Report.

[20] Open Government Partnership. (2024). Participatory Approaches in Digital Governance: Five Examples from the Field. OGP Report.

Keywords :

E-Governance; Citizen Trust; Digital Public Services; Transparency; Accountability; Digital Inclusion; ICT In Governance; Gov Tech; Legitimacy; Public Sector Innovation.